<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft &amp; Yahoo Team Up To Challenge Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:57:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomharvey</title>
		<link>http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/comment-page-/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomharvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-harvey.com/?p=29#comment-243</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see how it pans out and whilst may take a while can only be a good thing. All the best  
Tom  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see how it pans out and whilst may take a while can only be a good thing. All the best</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomharvey</title>
		<link>http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomharvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-harvey.com/?p=29#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Rob  
  
A good point indeed, a lot to be said about volume and it would be foolish to ignore. Guess the key is to look for the test to be successful and profitable before full campaign rollout. Thanks for the insight  
  
Tom  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob</p>
<p>A good point indeed, a lot to be said about volume and it would be foolish to ignore. Guess the key is to look for the test to be successful and profitable before full campaign rollout. Thanks for the insight</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-harvey.com/?p=29#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Traffic nearly always converts better on MSN - but sheer volume on Google means that you can&#039;t ignore it once through the early testing phase. 
 
Rob </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traffic nearly always converts better on MSN &#8211; but sheer volume on Google means that you can&#039;t ignore it once through the early testing phase. </p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomharvey</title>
		<link>http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomharvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-harvey.com/?p=29#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Thomas  
  
Have you enetered Frank&#039;s program, I would be interested to hear of any results that you have had!?  
I&#039;ve heard good things about both Myspace and Facebook PPC in that it can be very targeted and is still relatively cheap per click, so definately something worth exploring. All teh best.  
  
Tom  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas</p>
<p>Have you enetered Frank&#039;s program, I would be interested to hear of any results that you have had!?</p>
<p>I&#039;ve heard good things about both Myspace and Facebook PPC in that it can be very targeted and is still relatively cheap per click, so definately something worth exploring. All teh best.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomharvey</title>
		<link>http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomharvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-harvey.com/?p=29#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Jeff  
  
Thanks for the visit and insight into your PPC campaigns. What I like about PPC traffic is the instant nature of it in that it is turned on straight away as opposed to the free traffic methods which take time to build, so I think a combination of both is a good idea. You make an interesting point about buyer traffic on Bing as I have heard that before from some other affiliates, sounds ideal!!  
Thanks  
  
Tom  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff</p>
<p>Thanks for the visit and insight into your PPC campaigns. What I like about PPC traffic is the instant nature of it in that it is turned on straight away as opposed to the free traffic methods which take time to build, so I think a combination of both is a good idea. You make an interesting point about buyer traffic on Bing as I have heard that before from some other affiliates, sounds ideal!!</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bode</title>
		<link>http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-harvey.com/?p=29#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom 
 
I&#039;ve been working on using Microsoft and Yahoo PPC both. There is definitely good amounts of traffic on both and you can get cheap traffic and send them directly to an affiliate product if you wanted to (I don&#039;t). 
 
The cool thing is that you have a lot of control with PPC traffic. It&#039;s best to start out small and test to see what is working. 
 
From a statistical standpoint Bing has a higher % of buyers, so that&#039;s a definite plus. 
 
Thanks for the great post, I look forward to reading your blog more soon! 
 
Jeff Bode </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom </p>
<p>I&#039;ve been working on using Microsoft and Yahoo PPC both. There is definitely good amounts of traffic on both and you can get cheap traffic and send them directly to an affiliate product if you wanted to (I don&#039;t). </p>
<p>The cool thing is that you have a lot of control with PPC traffic. It&#039;s best to start out small and test to see what is working. </p>
<p>From a statistical standpoint Bing has a higher % of buyers, so that&#039;s a definite plus. </p>
<p>Thanks for the great post, I look forward to reading your blog more soon! </p>
<p>Jeff Bode</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomharvey</title>
		<link>http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomharvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-harvey.com/?p=29#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Erlyne  
  
Thanks for your visit and lack of comment on the trip, it was brilliant! Interesting to hear your PPC experiences, always good to get good traffic at low cost however not quite so when it isn&#039;t targeted how you would expect. At least it wasn&#039;t too expensive an experiment, and we can learn from your experience.  
All the best  
  
Tom  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erlyne</p>
<p>Thanks for your visit and lack of comment on the trip, it was brilliant! Interesting to hear your PPC experiences, always good to get good traffic at low cost however not quite so when it isn&#039;t targeted how you would expect. At least it wasn&#039;t too expensive an experiment, and we can learn from your experience.</p>
<p>All the best</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomharvey</title>
		<link>http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomharvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-harvey.com/?p=29#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by Roberta.   
As both you and Vance rightly say it is not by any means the answer but at least its a step in the right direction. The new partnership will definately be worth a look for some &#039;cheap&#039; traffic though, its important to be one of those savvy or lucky marketers!! Have a good weekend  
  
Tom  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by Roberta. </p>
<p>As both you and Vance rightly say it is not by any means the answer but at least its a step in the right direction. The new partnership will definately be worth a look for some &#039;cheap&#039; traffic though, its important to be one of those savvy or lucky marketers!! Have a good weekend</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberta</title>
		<link>http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-harvey.com/?p=29#comment-100</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Vance&#039;s comments, for the most part. It&#039;s going to take more than a &quot;small&quot; (by comparison) merger of the competition to make a dent in Google&#039;s grasp on the market. But that doesn&#039;t, and shouldn&#039;t, stop such efforts. Dictatorships don&#039;t last forever, whether a more effective force moves in, or a mistake is made within their own ranks. While all these these things play out, savvy marketers and lucky players can reap whatever benefits come along, as long as they recognize and grab them while they can. Great post, Tom. Thanks for spotlighting this news.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Vance&#039;s comments, for the most part. It&#039;s going to take more than a &quot;small&quot; (by comparison) merger of the competition to make a dent in Google&#039;s grasp on the market. But that doesn&#039;t, and shouldn&#039;t, stop such efforts. Dictatorships don&#039;t last forever, whether a more effective force moves in, or a mistake is made within their own ranks. While all these these things play out, savvy marketers and lucky players can reap whatever benefits come along, as long as they recognize and grab them while they can. Great post, Tom. Thanks for spotlighting this news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erlyne Escobar</title>
		<link>http://tom-harvey.com/29/microsoft-yahoo-team-up-to-challenge-google/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Erlyne Escobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom-harvey.com/?p=29#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom, 
 
No comments on your Octoberfest; you just had too much fun! 
 
As for PPC, I experimented with it a bit last year.  Using long-tailed keywords (3-5 words) that Word Tracker pulled out for me, I actually got some great traffic for less than $5. a day.  The problem was - it wasn&#039;t very targeted traffic; Googles&#039; idea of targeted must be different from mine.  :( 
 
Good review of Ryan&#039;s article here; caught it earlier in the week. 
 
Great commentary; keep up the good work. 
 
Erlyne </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom, </p>
<p>No comments on your Octoberfest; you just had too much fun! </p>
<p>As for PPC, I experimented with it a bit last year.  Using long-tailed keywords (3-5 words) that Word Tracker pulled out for me, I actually got some great traffic for less than $5. a day.  The problem was &#8211; it wasn&#039;t very targeted traffic; Googles&#039; idea of targeted must be different from mine.  <img src='http://tom-harvey.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Good review of Ryan&#039;s article here; caught it earlier in the week. </p>
<p>Great commentary; keep up the good work. </p>
<p>Erlyne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
